The Think Essay Prize competition has been hugely popular. Despite this being only its first year, we received 330 student submissions.
Thank you to every single applicant. We greatly enjoyed reading all your essays. We also owe a big thank you to the very many schools with students who submitted essays – we very much appreciate your support.
Given the competition produced so many applicants, we sought the help of a number of additional judges who were involved in the first stage of selection. Our thanks to all of them for doing a very thorough and professional job.
The judging panel has selected the following publications for the longlist:
- Joseph Ang, German Swiss International School: Deep (Learning) in Thought: Why we should not rule out humanised and not just human-like machines
- Sabrina Bissoo, St Mary Redcliffe and Temple School: Can I know that the world I experience is real?
- Ari Chi: Red Pill or Blue Pill?
- George Christiansen, RGS Guildford: Could a Machine Think?
- Giancarlo Colpani, Academia International School Zurich Oerlikon: Can I know that the world I experience is real?
- Scarlett Davis, Channing School: Can I know that the world I experience is real?
- Benedict Dooley, Liverpool Blue Coat School: Could a Machine Think?
- Ayush Gupta, Merchant Taylors School: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat?
- Vinayak Kedia, Seth Anandram Jaipuria School Ghaziabad: Thinking about Thinking: Can Machines Think?
- Gregory Musaelian, American Heritage School Plantation Campus: Whether Machines Can Think: Is Value What’s Missing?
- James Pannick, Haberdashers’ Boys’ School: Omnivore or Speciesist?
- Benjamin Platt, St Mary Magdalene Academy: Is the external world real?
- Jessica Searancke, De Lisle College: Could a Machine Think?
- Daniel Self, Merchant Taylors’ School: Eating (Cultured) Meat
- Ari Shtein, Washtenaw International High School: Machine thought on a continuum
- Jake Song Schnistzler, Bishop O’Dowd High School: The Colour Green
- Claudia Wong, Cheltenham Ladies’ College: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat?
- Kan Zhang, BASIS International School Park Lane Harbour: Being Skeptical About Skepticism
- Stephan Zuev, Westminster School: Is It Morally Wrong to Eat Meat?
- Gabriella Johnson, Monmouth School for Girls: An Exploration of the Metamorphosed Man’s Reality
Please note the longlist doesn’t include one applicant for privacy reasons.
Dr Stephen Law, Editor of Think and Chair of the Judging Panel, writes:
The quality of every single entry was of a good standard. We greatly enjoyed reading all the essays. What was particularly impressive was the clarity with which every contributor wrote. Essays were without exception easy to read and digest and clearly focussed on argument.
More comments from our judging panel:
The experience of being a judge for the THINK Essay Prize Competition was fantastic. The number of entries was very high, and participants engaged so well with the questions set (often using very different approaches). Lots of impressive knowledge, and understanding on show, and, importantly, excellent skills of philosophical analysis and evaluation. Well done to all involved! – Glenn Skelhorn
There were a few essays that stood out: they demonstrated a clear understanding of the question and sharp critical thinking skills. The essays I recommended all made their assumptions clear and investigated others implicit within the prompts. Philosophy is chiefly critical, not dogmatic, and it was this characteristic that all the best essays displayed. – B.V.E. Hyde
More information about the essay prize can be found here.
-
The 2024 Judging Panel
Natalie Armour
Katherine Ashmore
Chloe Rose Campbell
Jonas Fariacosta
Chrisantha Fernando
Joshua Forstenzer
B.V.E. Hyde
Grace Lockrobin
Chinaza Okonkwo
John Robinson
Glenn Skelhorn
Vidhi Taparia