Choosing how we Represent the Past

This lecture in the series Remembering and Forgetting is presented by Derek Matravers, and discusses how the choices we make in framing the past can influence our views on it.

The past comes to us through what it leaves behind, whether this be objects (buildings, statues, and the like) or testimony (films, books and the like). The dominant culture of the past was in many ways morally problematic. Because the dominant culture exercises such an influence on what has been created and survived, much of what comes through to us is likewise problematic. This talk will explore some of the complexities arising from the fact that when we engage with what comes through to us, our engagement is filtered through some perspective or other. The National Trust has to choose how to frame our experience of the houses in their care. Authors have to choose what information to present and how to present it. The choice of perspective can change, for better or for worse, the influence of the dominant culture on our view of the past.

  • Speaker

    Derek Matravers is Professor of Philosophy at The Open University and a Fellow of Churchill College, Cambridge. He has written Art and Emotion (OUP, 1998), Introducing Philosophy of Art: Eight Case Studies (Routledge, 2013); Fiction and Narrative (OUP, 2014); Empathy (Polity, 2017); and, with Helen Frowe, Stones and Lives: The Ethics of Protecting Heritage in War (OUP, 2024). He has been the co-editor on several collections, and is the author of numerous articles in aesthetics, ethics, and the philosophy of mind. He edits, with Paloma Atencia-Linares, The British Journal of Aesthetics.